Introduction: Assessing Antonin Scalia’s Place in Supreme Court
History
David Schultz and Howard Schweber
Chapter 1: Scalia, Sissies, and Administrative Law
David Schultz
Chapter 2: Justice Scalia’s Modest Employment Discrimination Law
Legacy
Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
Chapter 3: Playing Defense in the “Culture Wars”: Justice Scalia on
Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
Mary Welek Atwell
Chapter 4: Justice Scalia and Criminal Justice: A Mixed Record with
Conservative Impact
Christopher E. Smith and Charles F. Jacobs
Chapter 5: Threat and Suspicion: Scalia’s Legacy for A
Transnational Judicial Dialogue
Maureen Stobb
Chapter 6: The Anti-Madison: Antonin Scalia’s Theory of
Politics
Howard Schweber
Chapter 7: Justice Scalia and the Legal Conservative Movement: An
Exploration of Nino’s Neoconservatism
Jesse Merriam
Chapter 8: Justice Scalia and the Originalist Fallacy
Stephen M. Feldman
Chapter 9: The Jurisprudence of Justice Scalia: Common-Law Judging
Behind an Originalist Façade
Ronald Kahn and Gerard Michael D’Emilio
Chapter 10: Justice Scalia and Oral Arguments at the Supreme
Court
Tim Johnson, Ryan Black, and Ryan Owens
Chapter 11: Justice Scalia’s Concurring Opinion Writing
Ryan J. Owens and Christopher J. Krewson
Chapter 12: Justice Scalia’s Confirmation Hearing Legacy
Alexander Denison and Justin Wedeking
Chapter 13: Was Antonin Scalia a “Great” Supreme Court Justice?
James Staab
About the Editors and Contributors
David A. Schultz is professor of political science at Hamline
University.
Howard Schweber is professor of political science at the University
of Wisconsin, Madison.
Love him or hate him, everyone who cares about American law wonders
what the legacy of fiery Justice Antonin Scalia will be. This
comprehensive volume tackles that question by looking at his
addition to the Court, his jurisprudence there, and his role as a
public intellectual and political actor. Dissatisfied with just
cataloging his opinions, concurrences, and dissents, the authors
use a variety of approaches to evaluate Justice Scalia
holistically. In addition to providing striking insights about the
late Justice and his significance, the volume provides an
instructive stroll through the diversity of ways in which political
scientists think about law and judging. A must read for any serious
Supreme Court scholar as well as for both fans and opponents of
Justice Scalia.
*Julie Novkov, University at Albany, SUNY*
![]() |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
![]() |